Affordable Rent Act’s Limited Impact on Large Landlords: What Tenants Need to Know

Affordable Rent Act’s Limited Impact on Large Landlords: What Tenants Need to Know

As of July 1, the Netherlands introduced the Affordable Rent Act, a landmark regulation that brings mid-priced private rentals under the same points-based system used in social housing. While many smaller, private landlords rushed to sell their properties—citing lower rental yields—major institutional landlords report only modest rent reductions and no large-scale divestment. In this article, we explore how the new law works, why large landlords have been largely unfazed, and what tenants can expect in the coming months.

Understanding the Affordable Rent Act and the Points System

The Affordable Rent Act extends the Dutch woningwaarderingsstelsel (housing valuation system) to mid-priced rentals, capping the maximum rent at €1,158 per month for new contracts. Homes are assessed on factors such as:

• Living space (m²)
• Quality and energy label
• Outdoor space (balcony or garden)
• Availability of parking or storage

Each feature carries a fixed number of points; the total score determines the rent threshold. Properties scoring above the cut-off are assigned the maximum allowable rent. This measure aims to protect tenants from steep rent hikes in the private sector and to ensure affordability across the board.

For official details, see the Dutch government’s rental housing overview.¹

Small vs. Large Landlords: Diverging Strategies

Private Investors Feeling the Pressure

In the months following the Act’s introduction, many small-scale landlords—often individuals with one or two rental units—have listed their homes for sale. They argue that the capped rents no longer justify holding onto properties when a tenant vacates. According to industry reports, a significant share of mid-market homes is already back on the sales market, narrowing the pool of available rentals.

Institutional Landlords Report Minimal Impact

Contrasting sharply with their smaller counterparts, institutional landlords with large property portfolios emphasize that existing rents were often already below the new maximum. Key findings from recent industry interviews include:

• Vesteda (28,000 homes): Only 5% of new leases required an average rent cut of €90. Vesteda does not plan a widespread sell-off, predicting that sales will remain under a few percent of its portfolio.
• Achmea Real Estate (27,000 homes): Reports a mere 0.4% reduction in rental income—about €4 on a €1,000 rent. Achmea expects only a small subset of older, less energy-efficient units to see lower rents and will continue re-letting vacated homes.
• Greystar (5,000 homes): Reduced rents by up to €100 in a few individual cases, but has no plans to divest, viewing its holdings as long-term investments.
• ASR (5,500 homes) and BPD Housing (1,400 homes): Anticipate limited impact and have no concrete selling plans. BPD even plans to acquire more rental homes.
• Bouwinvest (19,000 homes): Will lower rents on roughly 875 homes upon contract renewal but sees no justification for broad selling initiatives.
• Amvest (22,000 homes): Yet to quantify rent adjustments but confirms its sales policy will remain unchanged.

Only Heimstaden (13,000 homes), a Swedish investor active in the Netherlands since 2018, reported average rent drops of €77—about 7.5%—across its mid-market segment. Heimstaden plans to sell roughly 90% of those homes upon vacancy, citing lower yields compared to its 4.5–5% return targets.

Why Larger Landlords Are Unmoved

Several factors explain why big players have shrugged off rent caps:

1. Existing Rents Below Caps: Many institutional portfolios were already priced below the €1,158 ceiling, especially newer developments with modern amenities and energy labels.

2. Economies of Scale: Larger firms benefit from centralized maintenance teams, bulk procurement, and efficient property management systems that keep operating costs lower.

3. Long-Term Investment Horizon: Institutional landlords often have multi-decade strategies, balancing rental yields with portfolio appreciation. A small temporary dip in rental income is less critical than capital growth over time.

4. Diverse Portfolios: Large investors hold properties across regions and rent segments, allowing them to offset marginal losses in one area with gains elsewhere.

What Tenants Should Expect

For renters, the regulation delivers clear advantages:

• Preventable Rent Spikes: New tenants in the mid-price segment can no longer face unchecked rent increases beyond the points-based cap.

• Greater Transparency: The points system makes it easier to verify whether a rent aligns with a property’s characteristics.

• Stable Supply: Despite initial sell-offs by small landlords, major investors are committed to maintaining their rental portfolios, ensuring a continued flow of professionally managed homes.

If you’re hunting for a mid-range rental, be sure to check the points score and maximum allowable rent before signing your lease.

Looking Ahead: Stability or Further Adjustments?

While large landlords have absorbed the initial shock, the housing market in the Netherlands remains tight. Policymakers and industry stakeholders will monitor vacancy rates and sales trends closely. If small-scale sell-offs continue, the government may consider supplementary measures—such as incentives for new construction or buy-back schemes for affordable rentals—to maintain a balanced market.

For now, tenants can take heart that institutional landlords show no signs of a mass exit. The Affordable Rent Act appears to strike a workable compromise: protecting renters without destabilizing professional housing providers.

Looking for your next rental in the Netherlands? Discover hundreds of listings on Luntero—the easiest way to find your perfect home.