Fairer Dutch Housing: Why Taxing Multiple Homeownership Is Crucial

Fairer Dutch Housing: Why Taxing Multiple Homeownership Is Crucial

The Netherlands faces an acute housing crisis, where skyrocketing prices and limited availability have left many without access to suitable homes. In its recent report Home in the Future, the Chief Government Architect and Government Advisors (CRa) make a bold case: to achieve greater fairness, the state must hike taxes on multiple homeownership and redirect the proceeds toward vulnerable groups.

The Current Landscape of Dutch Housing

Over the past decade, demand for housing in the Netherlands has dramatically outstripped supply. Cities like Amsterdam, Utrecht, and The Hague see bidding wars and waiting lists that leave even middle-income families struggling to secure rentals or mortgages. Two major fiscal drivers have intensified this squeeze:

1. Hypotheekrenteaftrek (mortgage interest deduction). Homeowners can deduct interest paid on their mortgage from their taxable income, effectively subsidising private ownership and inflating house prices.
2. Eigenwoningforfait (imputed rental value). Owners pay tax on a notional rental income of their owner-occupied homes, but current rates remain low compared to the benefits of ownership.

Meanwhile, speculative purchases of second or third homes—often left vacant or rented at market rates—divert precious housing stock away from long-term local residents. According to the CRa, this dynamic exacerbates social inequality: "It is illogical that some people can own multiple properties while others have no access to suitable housing."

Key Recommendations from CR a

The CRa proposes six interlinked strategies to rebalance the market:

• Limit the mortgage interest deduction. Scale back hypotheekrenteaftrek, especially for higher-valued properties and additional homes, to reduce speculative buying.

• Raise imputed rental value taxes. Increase eigenwoningforfait on multi-property owners, aligning their tax burden more closely with actual rental yields.

• Introduce a capital gains tax on second homes. Tax profits from the sale of additional properties to curb speculative flips and generate revenue.

• Establish a housing security fund. Use net proceeds from these new taxes to support rental subsidies and social housing for vulnerable groups.

• Promote communal and intergenerational living. Encourage alternative housing models—such as shared courtyards, residential groups, and co-housing—to foster social cohesion and optimise land use.

• Enable smart densification. Approve rooftop extensions, prefab infill units, and mixed-use developments on vacant farmyards to add smaller, sustainable homes.

How Taxing Multiple Properties Can Work

A heavier tax on additional homes can play out in several ways:

1. Progressive surcharge on eigenwoningforfait. Owners of a second property would pay a higher percentage of the notional rental value, shifting them closer to investor tax treatment.
2. Tiered capital gains tax. Properties sold within a short holding period (e.g., under five years) could incur a higher rate, discouraging quick buy-and-flip schemes.
3. Mortgage interest caps. Beyond the first home, interest deductibility could be reduced or phased out completely.

By aligning these measures with existing rental market regulations, the government can discourage speculative ownership while preserving incentives for genuine owner-occupiers seeking a primary residence.

Potential Impact on Renters and Housing Supply

The CRa estimates that reallocating tax revenues could finance thousands of new social housing units and expanded housing benefit schemes (huurtoeslag). A dedicated housing security fund might offer:

• Top-up subsidies for low-income tenants, narrowing the gap between market rent and what households can afford.
• Grants to housing associations (woningcorporaties) for building or renovating affordable units.
• Interest-free loans for first-time renters to cover security deposits or moving costs.

Meanwhile, by incentivising rooftop conversions and prefab constructions in urban cores, authorities could add tens of thousands of small-scale homes without sacrificing greenfield space. Coupling this with streamlined zoning approvals may accelerate supply, easing rental pressures.

Embracing Communal Living for Social Cohesion

Beyond fiscal reforms, the CRa highlights the Netherlands’ rich tradition of shared living—from historic courtyard houses to modern co-housing communities. As demographic diversity grows, so does demand for intergenerational and communal models:

• Elderly family members often live with younger relatives, reflecting traditions common among immigrant communities.
• Co-housing projects bring together people of different ages and backgrounds to share facilities, reduce loneliness, and lower living costs.

Local governments (gemeenten) can support these initiatives by adapting building regulations, providing pilot sites on public land, and promoting neighbourly governance structures.

Challenges and Considerations

Implementing these recommendations will require careful policy design and political will. Key challenges include:

• Balancing revenue and fairness. Overly steep taxes risk driving investors abroad or dampening household wealth building.
• Legal hurdles. Changes to mortgage incentives must respect constitutional property rights and EU regulations.
• Administrative complexity. Calculating tiered eigenwoningforfait rates and capital gains taxes demands robust tax-office capacity.

Nevertheless, the CRa maintains that the long-term societal benefits—reduced inequality, better housing access, and reclaimed communal spaces—outweigh transitional complexities.

Looking Ahead to 2050

By mid-century, Dutch cities and rural areas could look strikingly different:

• Rooftop walk-up buildings with lightweight timber, bio-based insulation, and recycled elements.
• Prefab community clusters on underused farmland, integrating food production, nature restoration, care services, and workspaces.
• Vibrant courtyard villages where multiple generations live, share amenities, and cultivate social bonds.

These visions rely on a housing market that perceives homes not just as investment vehicles but as common goods serving collective well-being.

Conclusion

Taxing multiple homeownership more heavily and redirecting revenues toward social housing and tenant support could be a game-changer for the Netherlands’ housing crisis. While the path forward involves complex trade-offs, a fairer system may be within reach by 2050—one where every resident has the opportunity to live in a stable, affordable home.

Ready to find your next rental in a fair and transparent market? Discover thousands of listings and rental tips on Luntero, your trusted partner in Dutch housing.